https://www.rt.com/news/488416-wuhan-mass-testing-china/
Despite the latest CCP propaganda about Covid being eradicated in China, it seems that they've announced 6 new cases of covid.
6 new cases leading to 11 million or all of Wuhan's inhabitants being tested. Absurd doesn't quite catch the situation here..
My take on this, is that what they really want is mass testings to have a clear database of who's-who.
Seeing that almost everything China did, the western governments later followed (via WHO), I'm predicting that they will soon unleash a "2nd wave surge" and use that to justify everyone to be tested.
And any square peg that doesn't fit the round hole will automatically and conveniently be "positive".
Not something I look forward to, but unless the prevailing winds change directions, that's where it seems to be headed.
PS: I'm still on the fence about what to make of covid and if there's really such a thing as some have been pointing out (i.e., Icke, andy kauffman, etc.) but it is at least as real as santa claus is (that is, in the collective consciousness)
My biggest pet-peeve is: What exactly are they testing? My understanding is, they're testing for immune responses to tell whether you've had covid or not. I hope I'm wrong, because that makes absolutely no sense. One can have an immune response with anything these days (histamines, sugar, EMF, allergies...) There's no doctor refuting any of the claims made by Icke regarding this in his interviews with Rose on LondonReal, and hence, the lack of utter credibility by the mainstream.
Trying to find explanations:
How do they difference an immune response from, say, allergies or stress, vs so-called covid? very vague explanations on how these tests work..
On the other hand, you've got Dr Luc Montagnier whom I tend to put my trust in(he's a nobel prize virologist after his discovery of the HIV virus), and he's saying there are traces of HIV in the Covid. Therefore, it presumes a covid virus in the first place, right?
At this point, I'm not smart enough to bridge those two conflicting points together. Time will tell...
Despite the latest CCP propaganda about Covid being eradicated in China, it seems that they've announced 6 new cases of covid.
6 new cases leading to 11 million or all of Wuhan's inhabitants being tested. Absurd doesn't quite catch the situation here..
My take on this, is that what they really want is mass testings to have a clear database of who's-who.
Seeing that almost everything China did, the western governments later followed (via WHO), I'm predicting that they will soon unleash a "2nd wave surge" and use that to justify everyone to be tested.
And any square peg that doesn't fit the round hole will automatically and conveniently be "positive".
Not something I look forward to, but unless the prevailing winds change directions, that's where it seems to be headed.
PS: I'm still on the fence about what to make of covid and if there's really such a thing as some have been pointing out (i.e., Icke, andy kauffman, etc.) but it is at least as real as santa claus is (that is, in the collective consciousness)
My biggest pet-peeve is: What exactly are they testing? My understanding is, they're testing for immune responses to tell whether you've had covid or not. I hope I'm wrong, because that makes absolutely no sense. One can have an immune response with anything these days (histamines, sugar, EMF, allergies...) There's no doctor refuting any of the claims made by Icke regarding this in his interviews with Rose on LondonReal, and hence, the lack of utter credibility by the mainstream.
Trying to find explanations:
WHAT IS AN ANTIBODY TEST?
source
An antibody test is a way of seeing if a person’s immune system has responded to something. In the case of COVID-19, it’s a way of seeing who’s had the new coronavirus, which is different from the tests used to diagnose the illness. Though antibody tests can be used to diagnose diseases, in the case of COVID-19, they’re not very helpful for diagnoses. That’s because people don’t make antibodies to fight off the virus until at least a week — or even two weeks — after showing symptoms. Tests used for diagnosis look for virus fragments and can spot infections much earlier.
How do they difference an immune response from, say, allergies or stress, vs so-called covid? very vague explanations on how these tests work..
On the other hand, you've got Dr Luc Montagnier whom I tend to put my trust in(he's a nobel prize virologist after his discovery of the HIV virus), and he's saying there are traces of HIV in the Covid. Therefore, it presumes a covid virus in the first place, right?
At this point, I'm not smart enough to bridge those two conflicting points together. Time will tell...
Last edited: