So, did greg just drop that he's going to be interviewing nassim haramein?
It's gonna be epic!
It's gonna be epic!
greg and nassim dream team
- Thread starter rani
- Start date
-
Hey Guest !
Welcome to the THC+ Forums. To participate you need to be, or at some point have been, a THC+ Member. If that's you, your THC+ Username is already here, but you need to establish a separate password for the forums, since access doesn't rely on your THC+ account being active. Just click the "Forgot Password" link and follow the prompts. Thanks and enjoy!
well, he said something at the end of the last interview about holofractal joe which was his nassim proxy.
I wonder if greg is now looking more credible now he has interviewed people like david icke and gerald pollack?
I wonder if greg is now looking more credible now he has interviewed people like david icke and gerald pollack?
I was delighted to see the THC episode with Nassim mentioned in the latest Resonance Science newsletter, alongside some very insightful articles.
https://www.neuroquantology.com/ind...MQq3wi0ISeB8_yPD0V4F5JU66FrLvQ&_hsmi=76321444
Here is the latest publication by William Brown from the team, on the topic of consciousness affected/affecting the environment through entanglement. I’ve only read the mouthful abstract so far, but it seems to nail down the “woo-woo” into concrete, scientific terms.
Not to mention it puts a whole twist on what memory is, from the assumption it resides in the brain, versus actually, we’re interfacing with memories stored in the Field (so-called spacetime memory network). Exciting times!
It begs the question, are people with good memories, good akashic field tuners?
Edit: so I went through the paper, and except for the esoterica related to DNA structure, it’s fairly straightforward, and eloquent paper.
However, there’s plenty of room to be blown away by the implications of this research.
Not only does it do away with the randomness of quantum behaviour, posited by what’s apparently known as the Copenhagen Interpretation (of quantum theory), but it describes the feed-back/feed-forward (torus) dynamics between mind-environment (and the implications for “human-to-machines interface”); as well as the inherent intelligence demonstrated across all-scales from micro to macro.
Case in point, he’s citing Gagliano, the plant priestess, and her research on plant consciousness, and how plants can have memory and learn from them, as well as other simple organisms, without the need for a complex system like a brain.
Personally, I’ve always loved Greg’s psychedelic anecdote about him having a conversation with a star.
I know some people think it’s bat shit crazy, but I’ve always been fascinated by that story.
If anything, this paper shows that it’s more than likely. That’s why gratitude to Sun and Mother Earth is important in my view.
William Brown’s expertise being on biology, my understanding is that this entanglement is what’s likely to be behind the underlying phenomenon of epigenetics (gene (de)activation by the environment).
I love the part about how, due to the inherent non-local behaviour of the Field, entanglement can happen invariant of time-and-space. First thing that popped in my mind was Near-Dear Experiences (NDE) and post-mortem communication (with the deceased; or even divination for that matter), as well as remote-viewing and other psi activities.
The conclusion points towards panpsychism ( consciousness is everywhere at all scales). Is animism any different than panpsychism? Not quite sure..
last but not least, the mention of photonic communication between cells, it reminded me of Li-Fi..
Perhaps even crazier, is how many of the same concepts are/were iterated by savants like Rumi and Shams of Tabriz more than 800-yrs ago.. now that’s visionary
https://www.neuroquantology.com/ind...MQq3wi0ISeB8_yPD0V4F5JU66FrLvQ&_hsmi=76321444
Here is the latest publication by William Brown from the team, on the topic of consciousness affected/affecting the environment through entanglement. I’ve only read the mouthful abstract so far, but it seems to nail down the “woo-woo” into concrete, scientific terms.
Not to mention it puts a whole twist on what memory is, from the assumption it resides in the brain, versus actually, we’re interfacing with memories stored in the Field (so-called spacetime memory network). Exciting times!
It begs the question, are people with good memories, good akashic field tuners?
Edit: so I went through the paper, and except for the esoterica related to DNA structure, it’s fairly straightforward, and eloquent paper.
However, there’s plenty of room to be blown away by the implications of this research.
Not only does it do away with the randomness of quantum behaviour, posited by what’s apparently known as the Copenhagen Interpretation (of quantum theory), but it describes the feed-back/feed-forward (torus) dynamics between mind-environment (and the implications for “human-to-machines interface”); as well as the inherent intelligence demonstrated across all-scales from micro to macro.
Case in point, he’s citing Gagliano, the plant priestess, and her research on plant consciousness, and how plants can have memory and learn from them, as well as other simple organisms, without the need for a complex system like a brain.
Personally, I’ve always loved Greg’s psychedelic anecdote about him having a conversation with a star.
I know some people think it’s bat shit crazy, but I’ve always been fascinated by that story.
If anything, this paper shows that it’s more than likely. That’s why gratitude to Sun and Mother Earth is important in my view.
William Brown’s expertise being on biology, my understanding is that this entanglement is what’s likely to be behind the underlying phenomenon of epigenetics (gene (de)activation by the environment).
I love the part about how, due to the inherent non-local behaviour of the Field, entanglement can happen invariant of time-and-space. First thing that popped in my mind was Near-Dear Experiences (NDE) and post-mortem communication (with the deceased; or even divination for that matter), as well as remote-viewing and other psi activities.
The conclusion points towards panpsychism ( consciousness is everywhere at all scales). Is animism any different than panpsychism? Not quite sure..
last but not least, the mention of photonic communication between cells, it reminded me of Li-Fi..
Perhaps even crazier, is how many of the same concepts are/were iterated by savants like Rumi and Shams of Tabriz more than 800-yrs ago.. now that’s visionary
PPS: I forgot to mention this , but allow me one more mad-rant about Flat Earth theory:
Brown on the geometry of Planck-scale voxels (volumetric pixels; the energetic pixel underlying matter):
I find this quite significant in the "debunking" of Flat-Earth. For, if I'm getting this right, the inherent stress-energy of the vacuum causes things to have the spherical shapes, which fractalizes at scale at the atomic, molecular, human, all the way to macro-galactic scales.
Case in point, (and please correct me I'm wrong) when I observe a bubble form and collapse, it's always spherical (at least in the current conditions on Earth).
My view about Flat Earth, is not so much as its wrong, but more so like its narrowing-down a multi-dimensional phenomena to a mere 2D-ish perspectives. It's not wrong to say the Earth is flat, if all you're after is reduce it to flat-imagery. But you're missing a big chunk of it (and dare I say, this is preicsely the psy-op's agenda, fogging the truth with falsehoods)
To be honest with you though, after reading some of Schauberger's views on the Egg-shape (and how asymmetry is required for the flow of energy, for in perfect balance things wouldn't move) I'm tempted to wonder if that's not the case with living systems as well, instead a pure sphere (modern science tells us it's elliptical, which tends to led credence to the egg-shape as well).
But what do I really know..?
Done with the rant, I promise!
Brown on the geometry of Planck-scale voxels (volumetric pixels; the energetic pixel underlying matter):
I find this quite significant in the "debunking" of Flat-Earth. For, if I'm getting this right, the inherent stress-energy of the vacuum causes things to have the spherical shapes, which fractalizes at scale at the atomic, molecular, human, all the way to macro-galactic scales.
Case in point, (and please correct me I'm wrong) when I observe a bubble form and collapse, it's always spherical (at least in the current conditions on Earth).
My view about Flat Earth, is not so much as its wrong, but more so like its narrowing-down a multi-dimensional phenomena to a mere 2D-ish perspectives. It's not wrong to say the Earth is flat, if all you're after is reduce it to flat-imagery. But you're missing a big chunk of it (and dare I say, this is preicsely the psy-op's agenda, fogging the truth with falsehoods)
To be honest with you though, after reading some of Schauberger's views on the Egg-shape (and how asymmetry is required for the flow of energy, for in perfect balance things wouldn't move) I'm tempted to wonder if that's not the case with living systems as well, instead a pure sphere (modern science tells us it's elliptical, which tends to led credence to the egg-shape as well).
But what do I really know..?
Done with the rant, I promise!
Attachments
-
9FBBBC81-7E61-4E4B-BE6C-18090BE79AB1.jpeg
Last edited: