The Case AGAINST Monsanto

  • Hey Guest !

    Welcome to the THC+ Forums. To participate you need to be, or at some point have been, a THC+ Member. If that's you, your THC+ Username is already here, but you need to establish a separate password for the forums, since access doesn't rely on your THC+ account being active. Just click the "Forgot Password" link and follow the prompts. Thanks and enjoy!
diogenesofsinope

diogenesofsinope

Member
Nov 8, 2016
82
33
18
Those correlations are very striking. Been trying to get my neighbor to use less or none of this crap. We share a well and he sprays a lot. He believes it is harmless. Cognitive dissonance, ugh. Perhaps if there was a test to do on our water to show him... Anyway thanks for the good article.
 
enjoypolo

enjoypolo

Moderator
Staff member
Jun 17, 2016
1,196
558
112
Upping that thread after reading this in the news today:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea...-Bay-Area-man-awarded-80-million-13721676.php

SF man awarded $80M after jury found Monsanto guilty of concealing lethality of Roundup. This is the second such case after Dewayne Johnson's original case a few months ago.
At this point I'm a little confused. Why is not Bayer, who now own Monsanto, barred from selling Roundup at all? I mean where is the compensation for the rest of the people who've been poisoned by this crap, aka glyphosate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rani
You must log in or register to reply here.

About us

  • The Higherside Chats Plus forums are a place for like-minded individuals and fans of the show to share and discuss all-things-alternative. By becoming a paid subscriber to The Higherside Chats Plus, even for just one month, you will receive a lifetime membership to these here forums.

User Menu

Login
Top Bottom